Fwd: CALL IT WHAT YOU WILL

-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 8:47 am
Subject: Fwd: CALL IT WHAT YOU WILL

         or "THIS is NOT the LAST CITIZEN REPORT - continued" or "ELEPHANTS and RABBITS             
                                                    by Richard DePersio                                                          "Now where was I" was what Jack Parr (the second host of the "Tonight Show") said (how old are     you?...not that old, read about what he uttered; by the way, Steve Allen - '53-58, Jack Parr - '58-

'64, Johnny Carson - '64-84 - - best host, who came after him? Canon O'brian?) The show was live

back the, His monologue wasn't aired in mountain ans pacific times: censored.  Next night, he

was furious and proudly proclaimed he would never be inappropriate of word. Stormed off show.

His befuddled announcer Hugh Downs had to assume the shows reigns. Jack went on safari n

Africa. Telegrams  exchanged between him and NBC. He returned after two weeks and began

he show by saying:  "Now where was I?"

       A non-racist - not anti-religious warning to whites. blacks, Christians, Jews, parents,   grandparents and the chronically ill... You're taking on a lot; Are you sure that you can handle it?..

One shouldn't attempt that which is destined fail. Timely: election primer.

       For shame. America's public schools since teacher's unions. Brace yourself. We didn't realize

how tough our parents and grandparents had it. Undo Immigration Act of 1965. Obama healthcare

reform takes another power away from the doctor/patient.And, more controversy; we personally

guarantee it. Have we ever let you down? As they used to say in "Dragnet": "Just the facts, ma'am."

he truth shall set you free. Hallelujah!

      Marxism originated in 1840s which led to liberation theology in Latin America in the 1950s and

black liberations theology in America in the 1960s within the Roman Catholic Church. Condemned

by a lazy Pope in the 1980s. It combines communism with the following concepts: whites can't be

saved unless they give much of what they worked hard for  to blacks - charity is a Biblical    requirement for Caucasians and not something that they can do voluntarily; hatred of America -   "God damn America"; hated of whites, especially, Jews. Obama's three spiritual advisors    subscribed to this brand of corrupted Christianity. The one his white grandparents secured for        him as a teenager because he was having an identity problem: Who am I?; Am I white?                 Am I black; Am I muslim?; Am I Christian. It is in his autobiography. What he needed was a psychiatrist! We (can't  recollect his moniker) was followed by 20 years of the Rev. 'Wrong.' Who     can forget that clown. Obama has one-of-those now! Note: Obama's parents were socialists and      his treatment of Israel. Blacks who object: don't stop reading because something is coming.

     Marxism originates in the 1840s. It begets progress-ism in the 1870s. Progressives become

liberals circa 1950. They commit much economic upheaval and social experimentation under

FDR and Wilson. Even more damage in 1960s with LBJ's Great Society Programs, the birth of

the modern women's movement, the drug culture and the sexual revolution. Pure and                   unadulterated liberalism. There goals to be realized become: Crippling Christianity - their biggest

obstacle (actually, it goes back to 1930s when the founder of the "american civil liberties union"

stated public goal was protecting everyone's liberties and secret goal was weakening influence of

Christianity ( a few minor anti-Christian judicial decisions in 1930s and '40s); control of public

elementary and high schools and colleges; control of newspaper, T.V., movie and music

industries. Forgot: fed civil servants could unionize (serve union not citizens) in early '60s and

state workers in early '70s - most gov employees were forced to do so. Public schools nearly as

good as Catholic schools as far as education and discipline prior to '60s, first and biggest

teachers union forms in early '60s, we went from spending a moderate amount on public schools to

a five-fold increase today and what do we have to show for it!. Albert Shankor, the head of

the union in the '60s said: "We'll care about he kids when they're old enough to pay union dues."

    "The New England Primer"  was used in most public schools from sea to shining sea from 1690

to 1930 and consisted of: rhyming alphabet; alphabet of lessons for youth; Bible questions;

Catechism. It was young persons first textbook at whatever age he started school if he were

fortunate enough to live in a own or city with a school. It wasn't uncommon for a child to graduate

college at the age of 16 or younger.Do you think that it was because there wasn't much to teach or school was easy One by one beginning in 18o0 states introduced grades. Children as young as

six had "The New England Primer." most of today's thirteen year olds would have trouble 

understanding it! The Bible was also used in public schools until 1964 to teach reading. Math?

Here are math problems culled from text books between 1750 and 1960 for children 10 to 14:

"I insured of a shop worth $3600, and four-fifths of a house worth $6000, paying $126: what was

he rate of insurance?; How much money must be given with nine $100 shares at 15% discount,

in exchange for for eight $100 bonds at 2% discount?; On a farm there are 60 animals - horses,

cows, , and sheep; for each horse there are 3 cows, and for each cow there are two sheep: how

many animals of each kind? here are some questions from an elementary school history textbook:

"What is a 'writ of habeas corpus'?" and "What is the second amendment" and

"What is an ex-post-facto law?" The dumbing down of America enabled liberals to take powers

from the states that are constitutionally the states and rights from the people. It is there version of

a 'divine' plan. legislative bills, judicial decisions, executive orders and fed regs beginning big-time

in the '60s to render Christians second class citizens, degrade the sanctity of marriage, destroy

the Protestant work ethic, glorify single parents even though their children have a greater chance chance to  wind up as drug addicts or in prison or drop out of school or  etc.Let's not forget wind up on social services and vote democrat - you don't bite the hand that feeds you.Lib dems that control

the party (not the vast majority of rank-and-file moderate-liberal and moderate dems) have a vested

interest in getting as many people on social services as possible, giving things that they don't

require and keeping them on the public dole for as long as possible because virtually all of the non-working and working poor vote democrat.Too bad, except for the truly needy. it is at the expense of

their pride. Although  to a large extent lib dems have convinced then not to feel quality because it

is due them. It is their right. Where in the "Bill of Rights" does it say that?

    There were a few reported cases of priestly bad behavior in the early 90s but the stories didn't 

have legs because he liberal media was still afraid of the Catholic Church. Not so a few years

ago when they made an estimated 3% of bad priest seem like 98%. It was libs dream come true.

The stage was set by January of 2009. Libs would take care of us from cradle to grave. There

was one last item on the lib agenda: make the dollar worthless! The people will beg to be saved.

Relinquishing Christianity and Capitalism for Secularism and Socialism if not Communism. We

now have proof the the economic/financial crisis was caused by Bill Clinton, the Chairman of the

Fed, Bill's Secretary of Housing, ACorn and the lovely Barney Frank and major source of

campaign funds: Fannie and Freddie. The former Fed Chairman admitted i three months ago

and Frank last week but glossed over by the liberal dominated media. The damage is done

and probably can't be undone even if Republicans control Congress: the old guard will be fighting

the constitutionalist and constructionist. We will loose or Triple 'A' bond rating, control of the

World Bank  and the IMF. Libs and mods will prevent the painful but necessary spending cuts

from being made. We will still have Healthcare Reform leading to Socialized Medicine, Financial

Reform crippling corporations ans small businesses, more fed gov subsidies and regs, 

skyrocketing energy costs. The fed gov has taken over student loans and declared all water in and

around  the nation, including intra-state water and the puddle in front of your house subject to           federal control and regulation. They will continue to partially own and  control banks, insurance   companies and auto industry - God, damn the Constitution! They will seize partial control of   corporate and family-owned  farms. You won't be able to purchase gold and silver. While

unlikely. there could be a miracle if republicans control congress and a majority of state houses.

The key: No bill can be passed unless sponsors of bill can prove its constitutionality; Congress

not funding healthcare reform. Spending bills can't be fuller-busted and require a simple majority

to pass - deny the simply majority. Cut corporate and capital gains taxes to create jobs, make

America more competitive, increase R & D, expand existing and build new factories, de fang

unions, pass loser-pay, convert all regular public schools into public charter and magnet schools, enable NASA to once again be main technological engine of our economy! Energy independence -

NASA  can help there - with a concern  for the environment not going off half-cocked and making

out decisions and judgement predicated on falsified useless U.N. climate data for Cap-and-Trade

will make president soros and al gore richer but cause your energy bills to increase 4-fold over the

next ten years, perhaps, 6 to 8 over the next twenty.

    Undo Immigration Act of 1965. It replaced Act of 1024. According to Wikipedia: "An annual

limitation of 3000,000 vistas was established for immigration, including a 170,000 from Eastern

Hemisphere, with mo more then 20,000 per country." This includes Indonesia which has the

largest muslim population in the world and most of Middle East (southwest Asia and northeast Africa). It placed a limit of 125,000 on Western Hemisphere. "By equalizing immigration policies.

he Act resulted in new immigration from non-European nations which changed the ethnic make-up

of the United States. The most dramatic effect was to shift immigration from Europe to Asia, Central

and South America." and, Mexico. According to "Carnegie Council" on "CUNY-T.V.": Congress

didn't appreciate how fundamentally transformative legislation was." Spearheaded by Senator Ted

Kennedy who  was responsible for more legislation in the Senate being passed then any other senator in history - too bad it was all bas lib leg. This particular piece of legislation is anti-white,

anti-black and anti-Christian.They weren't aware of what they were doing! It reminds us of many

countries in Western Europe passing a church tax about twenty years ago ostensibly to help the

majority of churches that were financially-strapped. Result: Most 20 to 40 year olds stopped

attending church rather then pay the tax. They also lost the voluntary contributions from those

individuals as well. Most churches in those countries have seen a sharp decline in church

attendance with over 75% being over 65. These nations have become secular some might say

sinful. Christianity defeated. Here the Catholic Church did more harm to itself then libs were ever

able to do.

    It is projected that in 35 years or less that there will no longer be a majority in America but       that whites will be the largest minority and that within 75 years Hispanics a.k.a. Latinos will be the

largest minority or the majority. Blacks worked hard for equal rights upon securing their

emancipation. According to the census, they were the largest minority in 1990 and after a mere

ten years, they were displaced by Hispanics. 2000: Hispanic - 14%; African-American - 13%;

Black other then African - 3%. What shocker will emerge from the 2010 census! This doesn't

factor in the estimated 12 million illegals (Hispanic - 9 million; Mexican - 6 of the 9; other - 3. Lb

dems want to grant them amnesty and immediately be joined by their spouses, underage 

children and elderly parents - we are talking about close to 40 million! Blacks don't like having

been kicked out of first place and a majority oppose amnesty. They had to work hard for their

rights and they are witnessing a reduction in their political clout. Yet, over 90% are stupid and

vote dem. What have dems ever done for them. Even the landmark legislation of the '60s was

passed because of repubs - which in not taught in public schools.

    The biggest enemy to libs had been Christianity. They didn't know what the were doing? Less

then 2% of the population is muslim and comes mainly from the Middle East and Indonesia. They   are baby machines. They and Hispanics are producing little imams and little tortillas faster then

all other groups. Libs have been promoting multi-multiculturalism for over 20 years while

discriminating against Christians, especially, the ACLU. The number of Americans identifying

themselves as Christians has dropped from 84% to 7 7% over the past 7 years. The countries

of Western Europe, former home of socialism (they have been moving slowly toward capitalism 

since the genesis of the economic/financial crisis while Obama has been going the wrong way)

recently declared tolerating in some countries and promoting in others was probably a bad idea -

sadly, they have probably come to this conclusion too late. When 'the people of the dome'

become the majority in a neighborhood or town, they slowly replace national and local laws

with sharia laws. We'll bet you a crescent and a star that Obama would prevented that from

happening here! English should be the official language and Western Europe History should    comprise 75% of world history taught in schools. You should have the right to wear your

traditional garb in public but Americans should have the right to criticize you for it - keep it

home! When Americans live or visit muslim nations they are compelled o abide by a dress

code, especially, women and the host country's moral code. Failure to assimilate only holds

people back.

    Liberal social experimentation threatens the majority status of whites, has weakened blacks

politically (lib dems have always taken blacks for granted) and muslims are accommodated while

Christians are told to keep it home and in church. 

 

    I'm back to resume article. Was doing research on secret military black projects...does it have    to do with this article?.. no...we don't care what you do in your spare time, get a grip...There is the    front line; there is behind the front line or the rear. It should be in the Geneva Convention that the enemy shouldn't have to take it in the rear except by Paratroopers or Special Forces.Don't mess     with national security and public safety. Liberals shouldn't be allowed to penetrate morale and        infect it. The majority don't want to serve with IT and morale should take precedence - for the     military     is a unique org and no place for further liberal social experimentation. Christianity de emphasis in armed forces - non-Christians would politely refrain from participation while now              it has been     removed from military traditions. .Women training, competing and being graded separately from men in military, Mental and physical standards lowered for women in police to    enter and   graduate from police academy since the early '80s. Fire departments fought for           keep their standards high not to discriminate but in the name of public safety. They finally  lost.    They     had to change mental and physical tests so that more women and minorities could pass.   Last year, new exams: 9 white men and one Hispanic male passed. Lib judge invalidated those     who passed.(She later became newest member of Supreme Court). Her decision was voided and   men were allowed     to become firemen.Ten points added to your civil service exam if you have a vagina or dark skin. And, you wondered why so many gov workers were incompetent! Homos         are immoral, according to the Bible. Are bad mutations if they are born that way, according to 

evolution. We are proponents of free will unlike most neurologists, geneticists and psychologists.

There problem is psychological and can be cured if they consciously and subconsciously want

it and are willing to work hard at it. Gov should not validate aberrant behavior. Same-sex

marriage forced in states by lib judges writing law which isn't their purview.Babies aborted

because they are deemed inconvenient; capital punishment for the most innocent.

We were watching doc "Picasso and Baroque" on "Ovation" and it stated that the inventors of

cubism were heavily influenced by early movies of the last century - fascinating...It is time to

leave...Why?...Your A.D.D.-ing...That's all folks.

Fwd: ADDENDUM PRIOR to CONTINUATION or CONTINUATION ONE

-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com "Not the Final Citizen Report" (find article proper at this site or enjoy
Sent: Sat, Oct 23, 2010 9:26 pm  without)
Subject: ADDENDUM PRIOR to CONTINUATION or CONTINUATION ONE

                                                      A P to C or C 1

Over 75% of workers are part of companies with 20 to 250 employees. Over one-third

will suffer if tax cut on those earning over $250,000 is allowed to sunset. Sole proprietorships

and partnerships have to pay employees out of their profits. Obama Job Creation Program:

They will be compelled to shut down or lay-off workers. Obama thinks small business

owners are rich!

         Presently, only a minority can pay all or part of health insurance for their employees.

Healthcare Reform will require all of them to pay all the cost. Obama Job Creation Program:

They will be compelled to shut down or lay-off workers.

        Most gov regs are unconstitutional or should be within the domain of states or

unnecessary or redundant or silly. What effect does it have on big business? Deters

creativity, originality, innovation - threatens U.S.'s number position in R & D; as a matter of

fact, we have been loosing number one slot in area after area. Another reason for you to

act on unusual chain letter: NASA chain letter. What effect does it have on businesses of

all sizes? According to Lisa Richard of "Institute for legal reform" - Businesses struggle at

great expense to comply with regs but still fear lawsuits over a product, most of which are

frivolous in nature (She supports "Loser Pay" as do we) coupled with lawyer on retainer  results in a rise in prices (61% of companies) or  a product becomes unavailable (45%) or          workers are laid-off (10%). CR can add: some take more then one action. Tons of new regs every year.                                                                                                                                                                             n     Also part of Obama Job Creation Program: Recent report from Chamber of Commerce (comprised of 85% small businesses and Obama hates C of C): Reduction in R & D spending (done primarily not solo by) big biz at an all-time low. Soros and Obama want to destroy capitalism and replace it with failed socialism or failed communism. Europe is moving     away from socialism and Obama and lib dem    congress under behind-the-scene Soros-control are doing the converse.

 

Fwd: CONTINUED: POTPOURRI: THE FINAL CITIZEN REPORTER REPORT?

-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd3939@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 19, 2010 10:04 pm
Subject: CONTINUED: POTPOURRI: THE FINAL CITIZEN REPORTER REPORT?

  OUR FOUNDING FATHERS (No P.C. allowed here; Framers - What is that? Something

  around paintings?) created a Republic which now totters on the Precipice).

                           "So Two cheers for Democracy: one because it admits

                             variety and two because it permits criticism. Two

                             cheers ate quite enough: there is no occasion to give

                             three. Only Love the Beloved Republic deserves that."

                                                                                             -E.M. Foster

                             

i

                          SUBTITLE: WE GOT THE HOTS for AMENDMENT TEN

                                                    by Richard DePersio

  (all comsats listed and described at: groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic)

Preface: I'm honored! Our ace reporter Citizen Reporter has never objected to my    writing an 'Editor's Note' but when there is a Preface that's his purview. CR wanted

to know what existed here before here: his house which was built circa 1940. He

contacted the local historical society which had declined to comment as they don't

do such research over the phone for individuals. Sometimes, it seems as if there is

more then one of 'him!' He played the old sympathy card: disabled and homebound

turning a negative into a positive and procured the information that he strongly desired:

"The XXX XXXXX (privacy; wants to avoid a punch in the nose for telling truth in his 

articles - the guy can't help it, he just can't help it) Greenhouse and Nursery. There were

lots for sale and the nearby gas station was on the map. The local private (for rich kids;

we hated them) technical preparatory school was a gymnasium (the term used in parts

of Europe, especially, Germany that prepares students for university) and this was an

Italian and Scandinavian neighborhood. I'm not cognizant of an equivalent term being

employed in Italy such as gymnasiumo (then again, I'm an Italian-American who doesn't

speak a word of Italian except for a few dirty words!).

       Prior to the 1980s, there were virtually no murders or assaults or rapes or robberies

- there might be an occasional assault if your  local store didn't pay protection money

or the private sanitation company (which picked-up trash for businesses; while public   for residences - no charge) or if someone didn't make a payment to the loan shark, otherwise, the mafia protected the area while occasionally 'borrowing' merchandise

from a wholesaler making a delivery to a retailer. I'm to young to remember; I'm

relating what I was told.

      When Ben Franklyn moved to Philadelphia in the 1840s, there was a Pennsylvania

colonial government with a governor appointed by the king which hardly did anything.

We being way 'across the pond' enjoyed more autonomy then other British colonies

around the globe. There was no police force and virtually no British soldiers and

virtually no crime for three reasons: 1) Ninety-nine per cent of the population was

devout, church-going Christians, majority, Quakers (but it was the same in all 

thirteen colonies no matter what the dominant Christian denomination was); 2) people

kept on eye on their children and house, as well as, their neighbor's, merchants kept

a look-out for each other's stores, 3) the boss paid a decent salary for a decent day's

work in a safe working environment  because it was the Christian thing to do - and

there was a strong Protestant work ethic, 4) prices were reasonable for your customers

were your neighbors and other merchants - it wouldn't be wise to charge too much to

people from who you make purchases.

      Today, 85 to 90% identify themselves as Christians and only 63% (Christians, Jews,

etc) attend services regularly or semi-regularly. Mom-and-Pop stores being replaced

by malls. People, much more so in cities then towns, mind their own business - they

wouldn't dare report on misbehaving child for fear of receiving a 'thank you' in the

form of a "mind your own business; raise your own child" and a black eye! Yet, CR

thinks hat we can improve things via Constitution but magic would be required for all

positive aspects of Ben's Philly - the largest city in the colonies a the time.

Preface 2: Editor is gone; kicked him out; punched him first. Where does he get off

writing a preface. Kicked him out because he made me angry. I hear that silly little

women on girlie show "The View" worked out because of a comment made by Bill

O'Reilly. Would you storm out of your house if a guest offended you? Would you

boss run out of his office because of your words? 

       Was he talking about 'people of the dome'? Wrote article about them. Let's

find out if their receiving funds from "muslim brotherhood" like most so-called

'moderate' mosques and other facilities do and stop construction at sacred Twin Tower site for national security reasons if they are.

       We define a socialist nation as follows: 1) The fed gov consumes 20 to 30% of

GNP - the U.S. has arrived at 25% courtesy of Obama; 2) the fed gov employs over 30%

of workforce - Obama has brought us to  50%; 3) Gov workers on average make more then private sector workers - for the first time in our history that is the case; 4) Gov 

directly and/or indirectly owns and/or controls and/or subsidizes 20%  to 30% of

private sector - Obama has brought us to approximately 20% and will grow to over 40%

over next four years; 5) Gov controls about 25% of means of production - we are at 5%;

6) Big gov - large number of laws, regs, workers. You know answer unless you live in

Plato's cave!

      We are now or on the brink of being a secular capitalist/socialist nation. Let's not

forget that corporate welfare (subsidies), social programs and unions are socialist in

nature.When our nation was created, it consisted of four departments and a handful of agencies. Over the past century growth to 14 departments and a thousand agencies and 43 czars most of which are unconstitutional.                                                                                                                          b    Fed Gov direct and indirect control of fiscal and monetary components of our

economy was less then 3% from founding to between about 1890 and 1910. It grew to

about 7% by 1921 and declined to about 5% by 1929. Rose from 5% to 25% by 1946. It

varied between 12 to 17% between '46 and '63. It arrived at nearly 20 by '69. It declined

to about 15% in the '80s and rose to about 17% by 2009 and close to 30% now (in the ballpark figures: precision isn't possible due to variables, disagreements over statistics and definitions we have attempted to go with a consensus). Bare in mind: 100% under

communism. Certain numbers should give you pause for alarm as to where we are 

headed if left unchecked and then rolled back. Red flags: debt; healthcare reform;

financial reform; potential red flags: cap-and-trade by congressional legislation or

executive order and new EPA regs; loss of triple 'A' bond rating; loss of control of

World Bank and IMF; international currency no longer based on dollar because dollar is

worthless. We say red for communism, especially, as regards health, finance, energy

plus aspects of business and private lives of citizens that gov wants to control but not listed.

      We must demand a Constitutional Convention. Presently, a number of states are

challenging constitutionality all or part of Healthcare Reform. This isn't real

Nullification Doctrine. Real Nullification would be for a state to disregard a fed law or

reg or etc. You are saying: "It would cause chaos if states picked and choose which fed decisions to except and which to refuse. Our Founder Tom said that it might be

necessitated if fas gov became tyrannical and threatened state powers and individual liberties. This reporter, in a recent article,  spoke of Marshal Law being declared by Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff as last resort and why I need not be feared. Unconstitutional to restore Constitutional. Read essay less you think CR has taken leave of his senses; CR can't afford to loose anymore.

       Its responsibility: restoration of Constitution. Problem began about a 

hundred years ago and has gotten PROGRESSIVELY worse with certain years of

respite. Outlandish interpretation of "Commerce Clause." It expanded at the expense

of "Amendment Ten." State powers and citizen's rights shrunk. All congressional

legislation, judicial decisions, executive orders and federal regs must be reviewed to

determine if they violate "Constitution, including, 'Bill of Rights'" and "Federalist     Papers" definition of 'Commerce Clause' and 'Amendment Ten.' We also concur with

Republican proposal that all future congressional bills come with an attachment

justifying bill as constitutional, otherwise, measure can't be considered. It would stop

the bleeding but a lot of blood has already been lost. Most of you are to stupid to

realize what's happening. Keep watching "American Idol" and fires and care chases on the local news. You won't feel it until full impact in four years and then it will be too   late. And, don't vote in November. Show how stupid you. You waste of carbon and  water.

     Perhaps, there should be a test to determine who has enough marbles to be eligible   to vote. Convention is suppose to propose amendments for ratification by three-quarters

of state legislators who had chosen delegates to Convention This method has never been employed. In the past, Amendments to the Constitution were proposed by one or more members of Congress adopted by over a two-third vote of both houses of Congress. We need a new-type of C.C. to do more. It must review laws, judicial decisions, etc. rendered over the past 100 years at federal level to ascertain  what can be retained, what must be

modified and that which must be rendered null-and-void. State legislators or state

attorneys-general  would vote on decisions.  C.C. should be comprised of two-thirds regular citizens from all walks-of-life, including, religious (retirees and those who can't take a leave-of-action like jury duty. Process can take months, a year or more or years.    It would be an on-going process with votes being taken periodically not after C.C. completes all of its work. It would necessitate Constitutional Amendment to Amend Constitutional Amendment process.  Hopefully, they will leave those rendered null-and-void/unconstitutional  buried and not attempt in the future to replace it with a state-version. Fonding Father's wanted small gov. People don't realize it but their lives are regulated in millions of ways, including, thickness of leather in shoes! Too many laws and regs stifle, especially, silly and/or  unconstitutional and/or unnecessary and/or redundant ones stifle individualism, creativity, innovation which damages citizens and businesses. Soon, we will have to check with Mrs. Obama on what we can have for dinner!

      Cr has opted to reiterate because you are probably too lazy. We don't live in a     third-world banana republic wherein military seizes control of citizen government and does doesn't return it it until and if forced to so. Our military is totally - mind, heart and soul -  devoted to Constitution. By unconstitutionally invoking - Obama has violated

Constitution at least five times - military would expedite process and we are confident

with substantial and active civilian participation.  And, quickly exit when job is done.

 

 Citizen Reporter doesn't subscribe to any religion or religious denomination          though born and raised as a Catholic. His views on God, Jesus, Heaven are rather unorthodox and are being expressed in a series of articles at comsat-ak.blogspot.com.  CR is a social   conservative as regards 90% of moral or values issues  and  10%  moderate or libertarian. Most Americans must return too their religious roots for our Constitution is predicated on many Biblical laws (613 not just top 10; many rendered                 inactive after destruction of Temple Mount which was seized by 'people of the dome')  and fresh stuff and British Common Law.              

       In "Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?" (Published by Prometheus - hey!,   referred to the now defunct Prometheus Rocket Program in a couple of our NASA  articles - Books in 2003) edited by Paul Kurtz it states: "...should skeptical scientific inquirers question the regnant sacred cows of religion? There are both theoretical and prudential issues here at stake. I can find no theoretical reason why not, but there may be practical considerations. For one it requires an extraordinary amount of courage today as in the past (especially in America!)." (CR: Pardon my injection - Most of Europe has gone secular, including,  with France  in the forefront; it looked as though Eastern Europe   would go Christian in a big way during the first few years of emancipation from the Soviet Union with its active underground Christian movement now unleashed to displace the state-controlled Christian Church; it didn't last in most of the countries of Eastern Europe with Holland leading the pack. The imposition of a church tax in much of Western Europe in the early '90s ostensibly to help financially-strapped churches backfired where predominately younger people opted not to pay it and not to attend; the churches get progressively more empty as the elderly get too ill to attend or die and you have fewer people paying the church tax and, in some cases, a little something extra.  One can only wonder if   there was an ulterior motive and real goal of these socialist governments. Recently, we heard a British PM state that in some ways nations of Europe are becoming less socialist while America is doing some of the stupid things that Europe began doing 200 years ago and, further, he indicated that the secularization of Europe has wrought great harm. WOOOOW-What A.D.D. Tangent.    Reel him in - he's way out there!)"...to criticize religion. One can challenge politicians, celebrities, cult figures, paranormal hucksters, mediums, psychics, and   astrologers with abandon, but to question the revered figures of orthodox religion is another matter, for this may still raise the serious public charge of blasphemy and heresy; and this  can be dangerous to one's person (CR: Is he making reference to radical and 'moderate' muslims?) and career.

(A Temporary Aside as opposed to a short or a s...h.....o....r....t A.D.D. Journey, we venture to assume: The proliferation of books, So many books, So many books by the same               author. It's as if they are coming off an assembly-line. We suppose that it can partially be         explained by the writer having quicker and easier access to information via the Internet. It       just seems that it took 5 to 10 years to construct a monumental creation: treatise, a classic, a textbook, a technical or professional writing for others in the same general field or  (WE JUST

REMEMBERED: CHURCH, BLASPHEMY, CAREER)     specialty. Other non-fiction not as lofty in ambition: 3 to 5 years while fiction of tier 2: 1 1/2  to 3 years. Hack writing (we define as an individual of moderate or, in rare cases, exceptional  talent who would generally produce     more books during his career then his contemporaries  by, some would say, "Selling out" or "Going Commercial" or "Lowering His Standards for the Almighty $$$ (what's wrong with  that? So long as you had written something of true  quality that may or may not have been a bestseller early in your career; or even if you hadn't: Capitalism Good).  Of course, some hack writers are mediocre  to moderate. All hacks write down to the less educated or those of average intelligence and those  desirous of sensationalism   romance or sexuality or what were once called dime novels, often mysteries and horror and westerns; of course, there not a dime anymore and there are on occasion books   in these areas of a high caliber (In contrast, mediocre writers can't get published except by vanity press or today's Internet equivalent of it; even some writers of average or moderate talent have chosen this avenue). The length of time to write a book in all categories seems to have been abridged. One senses - male intuition - that the process began about 20 years ago and accelerated about a decade ago with many more authors experiencing Gs. The non-fictions which took 3 to 5 years are being written in 1 to  3 years and the fictions that took     1 1/2 to 3 years seem to be taking 1 to 1 1/2 years. It  is anecdotal evidence: The number  of (CHURCH, PERSON, CAREER, BLASPHEMY)authors with large output seems to have increased dramatically. Every year or two, they are plugging their latest literary birth. On rare occasions, the are asked how long they worked on it    and they seem embarrassed  to say: "one year or so"; sometimes, they are devious: "on and off for three years." Many are selling T-shirts,  coffee mugs and whatnot with their prolific births. Wasn't Bill of O'Reilly the first noticeable author/marketer? Bard of Avon must be rolling over in his  grave! Don't misinterpret CR:    There have been books that were written in less then 2 years that are superior to  books  of a much longer gestation. We believe that author Issac Asimov still  holds the record for most books written  and he was anything but  a hack.

It's a MIRACLE-It's a FIRST: We just thought of a segue (champagne bottles are popping at all groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic lodges in the U.S., U.K, Israel and elsewhere; let's hope that the celebrating isn't premature): Back in the early '80s, there were a few          stories of priests molesting boys but the stories didn't have legs. It wasn't probed more then superficially. It didn't have legs: journalism parlance for a story that lasts three days or less Why? Back in the day, the media was afraid of the Catholic Church and to a           lesser extent Evangelical Christians. Let's assume that "Science and Religion..." took less then 3 years from conception to birth. The BIG Catholic Scandal began around that time or        shortly thereafter. There were a few minor immoral or anti-Christian ( such as subsidizing buses for Christian kids stopped but continued for public schoolers) judicial decisions rendered   between the early '30s and the late '50s and major, moderate and small ones since then with judicial and

legislative measures to destroy the sanctity of marriage beginning in the 60s.

      Let's really go back in time. Trust me, I'll validate it..Stay focused, CR...Marx and the                  forgotten guy (Marx must have had a dream team: manager; publicist; travel agent. He was out there - selling his monstrous creation)  communism in the 1840s. Engels is his barely remembered partner in political/economic trash. Communism failed and now            only exists in three pathetic third-world countries: Cuba; North Korea; some little            country on the 'dark continent." Canada and Western Europe are talking baby steps  away from failed socialism while Obama (his boss George Soros) and all those that surround him  want us to become a secular socialist, if not, communist nation! 

     Beck and company unintentionally generate impression that Wilson gave birth to

progress ism and don't know about whom WE consider the fathers of that loathsome

philosophy. Political spectrum: Progressivism - to the left - socialism - to the left -communism. The bad founding daddies were Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in the 1870s   and Louis Brandells in the   1880s. These founding fathers(the f---s don't get capital 'f's) of progressivism (no big 'p' ) but it wasn't called that until the 1890s. Further, that the genesis of the "progressive 'living' constitution" was with those two idiots and Woodrow Wilson contributed toward the development of the concept after 1900. It reached its final development in a book written by Professor Howard McBain in 1937. He coined the phrase "living constitution" and it was the name of his book (Thought

to ponder: how many lousy books did he write and how long did it take him to write them?).

    He certainly influenced the third worst progressive - FDR who wrote additional           rights that he wanted added to the existing "Bill of Rights" (which is part of "Constitution"; if you are having problems keeping up - look at other articles by yours truly; in case your curious Obama is No. 1 big 'p' with LBJ placing and Wilson bringing up the 'p' rear). The ROOTS of EVIL.

     Friendly advice: at this junction, you might want to reread quote from "Science and

Religion."

FINAL CITIZEN REPORTER? To be continued...