Fwd: UNION OF SOCIALIST SECULAR STATES OF CHINA

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 20, 2010 8:11 pm
Subject: UNION OF SOCIALIST SECULAR STATES OF CHINA

                                         

                                                 by Richard DePersio

                                groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic
         New website: rickscisite.blogspot.com; www.rickcmtsite.blogspot.com is back 

THE UNION OF SOCIALIST (PERHAPS, SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST COMBO) STATES OF CHINA. Last year, we coined the phrase: Union of Socialist Secular States of America. At this juncture. we wish to revise it to the title of this article.

       Correction: we recently stated that China had begun becoming a developing nation in 2000 and had rapidly become one by 2005. We were way off the mark! It began becoming a developing nation in 1985 had become one by 1990. It's government owned banks began making loans to and purchasing U.S. Saving Bonds in that year; it has done so at a rapidly accelerating rate ever since. We would describe China today as a industrialized nation and predict that it will be a post industrialized nation (or service economy) within 5 years, This represents amazing, startling economic growth even surpassing our illustrious economic history! We owe China (and Japan and England in that order) more money then any other nation. It should be noted that China has been

selling some of our debt to it to Japan - as a character in "Laugh In" used to say: 

Interesting, very interesting.

      It explains and puts into perspective certain things like why we felt that Clinton was

guilty of a felony - receiving campaign contributions from a foreign country and a traitor by giving aid and comfort to the enemy in 2006 (missile technology). We maintain that it was the biggest of an unbelievably long list of scandals painted by Clinton but the least investigated; we assumed that it was the least investigated because the Republicans had just been burnt by Monica L (no attempt here to spell her last name!). The scandal: China wanted to purchase certain technology from the U.S. In the case of

certain types of technology and certain countries a special committee in the Department of Defense must give approval to the U.S. company to make the sale. It had decided in the negative on the grounds that due to the nature of the technology, China which is claiming that it wanted it for domestic use, could too easily use it in their missile development program. Clinton in an unprecedented act over-ruled the Department of Defense and told his Secretary of Commerce to make the call.

He saw nothing wrong with the transaction. China immediately applied it to their missile development. Al Gore and the Buddhist Temple. During the campaign of '96, Gore visited a Buddhist Temple in California and later claimed that he didn't know why he was there. Business as usual. It's as if he goes to Buddhist Temples every week. The following year, it's suspected that he had been collecting envelopes containing campaign contributions from the government of China - it is illegal for a foreign country to interfere with a U.S. election  in any manner, shape or form, especially, campaign contributions. The money had been laundered of course -  passing through many hands and organizations. The liberal so-called mainstream media virtually ignored the story. You had to take the little information that they were supplying and downplaying and couple it with reliable but outside the mainstream sources which was harder to do back then when there was only one cable news network - liberal-biased CNN and Fox and MsNBC infants and of no significance (Today, FOx dominates and MsNBC is still an infant!). There weren't many on-line political blogs and websites and virtually all were unreliable. You had to struggle to find information from reliable alternate sources for the liberals began controlling telelivision,newspapers, music industry. movie industry, as well as, public elementary schools, public high schools and public and private colleges in the '60s). Quid pro quo: sensitive missile technology in exchange for dirty campaign money. It troubled me though - even sleaze ball Clinton wouldn't

betray his country for money that he certainly could probably do without. It has gnawed at me all these years; we felt that there had to be more to the story. There's a lot of evidence but much has turned cold since then about these alleged monumental Clinton crimes. Recently, the nebula dissipated thanks to Glenn Beck and Charles K. (of Special Report on FOX; I won't attempt to spell his name) our debt to China was growing. A couple of years ago, Bush didn't make much of a fuss over tainted baby food made in China and sold here. Last year, Australia wanted to make a move to reduce it's inflation but China felt that the economic moves might have unfortunate ramifications for China. Australia didn't implement program. By the way, Australia is also deeply in debt to China.(Could this foreshadow America's future policy decisions?) There have been unconfirmed reports that the Obama Administration has instructed the C.I.A. and other intelligence-gathering agencies not to keep as close an eye on China. It is suspected that China has infiltrated our computerized infrastructure and made be capable of doing things like - if   not now but in the not too distant future - disrupting our power grids and gaining access to U.S. military secrets.We can be certain that there may never be a thorough investigation -  it would be a major crime for Clinton to have received the dirty money - felony; advanced Chine's missile program - treason! And, now, the CIA and our 13 other intelligence-gathering agencies may only have one eye on China!  And, is it because our government doesn't want the world, including, Americans to know how the RED, WHITE and BLUE is turning YELLOW!!!

We have contended that the unions destroyed the public school system, Amtrak, the postal system the airline industry and the auto industry with it's unreasonable demands. Union demands and much - not all - unnecessary government red tape and regulations - much of which are silly has resulted in higher production costs, overhead and prices ascending while prices and money left for R & D descending. Making American products and services less appealing to Americans and consumers

in other nations, the matter should have been handled by a bankruptcy judge who would have spread the pain to all involved. Unions are bad for business and consumers and worse for governments. Back in the '60s and 70s, we allowed federal, state and local civil servants to form unions. At least, when there are negotiates between large- and medium-sized companies' execs and union bosses, one side of the table is concerned with saving money and reducing costs. In his State of the Union Address, Obama stated that U.S. exports will increase 5-fold over the next 5 years (more likely prices!). Does he live in fantasy land. Is he an avatar in that virtual life website where there is money, stocks, houses, sports, stores, cars, etc. SOMEBODY PLEASE TURN OFF THE PRESIDENT'S COMPUTER!!!