Fwd: HOCKEY PUCKS (AS DON RICKLES WOULD SAY)

-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 8:39 pm
Subject: Fwd: HOCKEY PUCKS (AS DON RICKLES WOULD SAY)

                                             by Richard DePersio

                            check out new site: rickscisite.blogspot.com

       Dear Hockey Pucks,

       It's my term of endearment for those who bow at the alter of the infamous 'Hockey

Puck Graph and idolize the false prophet Al Gore and his disciples( U.N. scientists).

Scandal after scandal after scandal as world-renowned scientists commit the biggest

sin or crime: 'Thou shall not violate the scientific method" even in the name of the paper

chase: pursuit of or renewal of U.N. or government or university grants.

      Many, if not most, of you don't have a clue as to what I'm talking about because

it has been ignored or downplayed in the so-called mainstream liberal media. I talking

about nothing less then the biggest scandal in scientific history!

      It makes sense now. Ten years ago, a super-majority (60% or more) of Americans

subscribed to the view that large- or medium-scale global warming caused by humans

was fact. Within the last couple of years, the number dropped to below 50% with some

of them realizing that it was speculation, perhaps, theory and that there wasn't a general

consensus amongst scientists. This prompted the Chairman of the Democratic National

Committee to instruct democratic politicians to stop using the term 'global warming'

and replacing it with 'climate change' - a political marketing decision and not a

scientific one - in effort to get Americans to worry about faux science again. He did so at

the end of last summer. A few weeks later, I asked my nine year old niece if she

was learning about fake global science in school. She politely interrupted me and

said: "Don't you mean climate change?" It seems to me that the Chairman was not

only sending memos to democratic politicians but public school principals as well. Recently, this

reporter has come to suspect that the Chairman and other prominent democrats

new something that where just discovering. We have learned in the past few weeks -

well, some of us have learned - that certain scientists with impeccable reputations,

especially, those associated with the U.N. Commission on Global Warming were

falsifying data, suppressing those with alternate views from being published in

prominent climatology journals, the peer review process had collapsed, they were

using data from masters degree students, data had mysteriously disappeared, using magazines like, "Mountain Climbing." A hacker discovered emails being sent

among these fake scientists on how to fudge  the data and later they were

emailing each other about ways to cover their tracks. Apparently, the earth's average

atmospheric temperature had increased by 1/2 of a degree between 1895 and

1995 (according to them) which they attributed to the Industrial and post- industrial revolutionary

periods - factories, oil, cars, etc but then the warming stopped - leveled off beginning

in 1995. They must have been alarmed about loosing their precious

grants. They also determined that there was a warming period between 1000 and

1400 A.D. (not warm enough and too short to be considered an inter-glacial period)

which they couldn't explain and opted to tape their months shut and besides they

had

a more immediate problem: what happened to global warming between 1995 and

2000. Solution: Violate the Holy Grail of Science: the Scientific Method! The most

creative was their artistic creation: the Hockey Puck Graph.It continues to flat line to this day.

       It would appear to this reporter that, perhaps, the Chairman and some other

democratic bigwigs got wind of it last year. Global Warming had become like

a religion to the Democratic Party. And, maybe, another motivation for the name

change was: Global warming was the number one environmental 'problem' with

other ones being in a distant second, we better shift the focus in the event that

the truth sees the light of day - we must continue to deceive stupid Americans.

Where democratic politicians go so does most of the media. Were they executing

a pre-emptive action?

      This reporter is proud to say that predicated on his scientific background had

concluded in 1993 that run-away global warming (remember: global warming in

and of itself is a good thing; we couldn't exist without it but liberal politicians and liberal scientists were using the term  inappropriately - saying global warming instead of run-away global warming and had forgotten about the albedo effect: cooling which balances warming creating a livable steady-state) was highly improbable. In 2005, I saw the results of the five recently released major studies.The NASA study using satellites to measure temperatures at various levels in the atmosphere (over the past 10 years, the tree ring study, climate change (more on that momentarily) and  one other (ADDed, again) indicated that little or no increase in temperature had taken place over the last 100 years while only one did indicate significant warming - it was based on surface temperatures which, by the way, are reliable on land but not so reliable at sea. Getting back to the climate study of the past one hundred years indicating 0 to a 1/4 of percent increase it didn't get widespread media coverage. I garnered the information from science magazines like "Science Digest" and the Internet, including, NASA's website.

      I just realized something: I'm a scientific prophet - I knew about 1995-2000

ahead of most people! I could have been famous. I should have used  my

big crystal balls and predicted what has unfolded over the past three weeks.

     By the way, two more major studies were released last year. One indicated that

there would be a 2% rise in temperature over the next hundred one years - and they

can't even accurately predict the weather over the next week! And that it was being caused by humans or a change in the energy output of the sun or a combination of both.The other showed that 'Global Cooling' was the name of the game! And, the

lousy, little, lying liberals have been telling you that this was settled science since

2000. (Notice that this article is on one of my political websites not my scientific

ones).

    Congress can't pass cap-and-trade energy energy reform as a result of public skepticism regarding global warming or climate change and public opposition to the bill. Your messiah president is going to do an end-run around the American public and get his unpopular energy reform by executive order and the EPA. He's thumbing his nose at Americans - again!!! Expect your energy bills to quadruple over the next ten years and your standard of living to lower because of the pistachio nuts to no avail as China which is just beginning to taste a higher standard of living has know intention but to maintain it's high pace in oil drilling in Africa and factory building at home. Obama is going to make you suffer in vain! And, what if cooling is taking place we would be harming not helping the environment. China is right.

       We should be concerned with energy independence with a rational concern

for the environment - the sky, my friends, isn't falling. And, now, believe it or not, U.N. scientists are claiming that the increase in snow is evidence of global warming. Between 1977-1979 they claimed the increase in snow was prove of global cooling!

     Normally, it would take years, if not decades, for a field or an organization to

regain respectability after a scandal of such proportions. Hockey Puck Liberals are

protecting their imaginary melting ice rink! Farewell, it was fun while it lasted, fairy tale...

                                                                                    Frosty the Snowman,

                                                                                    With warm Wishes, Rick