-----Original Message-----
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Jan 6, 2010 6:49 pm
Subject: THE LONG GOODBYE
From: rrdd3939@aol.com
To: rrdd3939@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Jan 6, 2010 6:49 pm
Subject: THE LONG GOODBYE
Editor's Note: rickcosmos consulted with a marketing expect at "Global Cash Flow
Network" regarding his statistical problem. He supplied the following information: 1) nine
members; 2) one person left two comments at one website; 3) no Adsense clicks - could be a gremlin; 4) Last month, Google indicated that sites receive between fifteen and forty-five hits per week - it varies from site to site, week to week; 5) an individual - I'm not a name dropper - visited one or more sites (the number couldn't be discerned) over 400 times and she - I'm a gender dropper - has done it since August. What was the question: Could we have more readers then we realized? We discussed flybys: an individual might visit a site and read one or more articles and return in a day or two and see no new fresh material, he or she may or may not return for a third try; websites need new postings daily in order to secure a following, therefore, the articles might be read by far more then nine people. Your Financial/Economic Editor is in the process of securing a certificate as a Certified
Placement Specialist. He conducted a comparative study and determined that "Global
Flow Network" was top-of-the-shelf regarding training, support and product. They receive
his seal of approval.
Nonetheless, he can't gloss over the 9-2 factor, avoid questioning positive statistical data and can't continue to fly solo (the workload has become overwhelming). He'll be posting his final article on Wednesday at 11:59 P.M., E.T.
Parting Thoughts...
Recently, this reporter saw a former (good for her) Muslim women and all seriousness aside, this guy can't recollect her name or where he saw her - TBN or
CUNY-T.V.? She stated emphatically that Islam was an evil, violent and hateful
religion - she corrected herself: political militaristic religion. This reporter thought:
she better have a callous, violent and hateful gang of body gauds for having told the truth! (There are advantages to being homebound!).
she better have a callous, violent and hateful gang of body gauds for having told the truth! (There are advantages to being homebound!).
As most of us know, Muslims prayer five times daily. She says that the first
payer is all about hating and killing infidels (Jews and Christians). She says that
the Koran, other holy books, and prayers are written only in Arabic. There are more
Muslims in Indonesia then in the Middle East and few of them speak
Arabic and they aren't told the meaning of parts of the Koran and prayers and,
in other cases, aren't told the true meaning but that these so-called moderates Muslims
whether they speak the language or not can easily be brainwashed and manipulated
into become militant. Further, she continued, some pretend to be moderate. She
says PC is dangerous; world leaders must open their eyes and see Islam the way
that it really is: a political religion which wants to create a world government with
only Muslim leaders and non-Muslims under such a regime would be treated
cruelly and as second class citizens if not slaves. They are already taking over towns
and cities in Western Europe, especially, France and ignoring French law and
imposing Shiria law - and that they plan on doing the same thing in the U.S. Oboma,
this is the writer talking, better wake up. He might have difficulty calling it a" War
of Terror" but the enemy considers it a" War of Terror" and a "Holy War"!
This observer got the distinct impression that she felt that only about 10%
were truly moderate and believe that Moses, Jesus and Mohammad were the greatest prophets with Mo being number one and didn't hate Jews and Christians but are anti-
Zionist (that Israel isn't Jewish land and that the Jews have no right to have a country there). And, that 90% were militants or militants pretending to be moderates or moderates that could be easily converted into being militants.
It was only a short time ago that Obama's Secretary of Homeland Defense said
that her greatest concern was for returning American troops who might be susceptible
to being recruited by right-wing groups, especially, militant ones. She's a she and her
name slips writer's mind but I wish that the other she would sit down this she and teach
the facts of life: who she should be most worried about 24/7!
Get a load of this racket: The Federal Reserve Bank and the Department of the
Treasury gave loans to investment banks at 0% interest and the Federal government
is borrowing money from investment banks at 3% interest! There is nothing unusual
about the Federal government borrowing money from investment banks. But this
situation is a first...nay...a scam being perpetrated on U.S. citizens!
Obama continues to borrow money, especially, from China and the Federal Reserve
Bank keeps printing money as if it were monopoly money. Some day where going to
have to pay the piper but the dollar will be nearly worthless. I can just picture
the Chinese leaders sitting around a short table and discussing their plans for their
new purchases: the Empire State Building, Yellowstone Park, Shell Oil, NASA and,
perhaps, the White House: America fade to black.
Rifles and grenades must trump penises and vaginas! A general was
furious when a female soldier was impregnated by her soldier husband and that she
would receive an honorable or a medical discharge. He wanted to have her courts-marshaled. Pat Robinson stated that it would have represented her civil rights being violated. I'm shocked at Pat. The general was right and shouldn't have reconsidered. He explained that when married or unmarried women take off their uniform and get pregnant and then have to take off their uniform again after receiving a second discharge (Yours truly's words; not the general's) he has to wait weeks or months for a replacement - this is no way to run a war.
Enough already, it's bad enough that standards are lowered in basic training so that
women can play soldier - a few women - - the big chunky ones - might be able to
meet the man's standards but we'll never know and, therefore, none deserve respect.
And, further, real women shouldn't want to be soldiers! By law, women can't serve in
combat but are now allowed in semi-combat (don't have the time to explain: deadline
is approaching). Only 12% of military personnel are female. Soldiers are suppose to
protect each other's backs but we'll bet that male soldiers consciencely or
subconsciously spend an inordinate amount of time protecting a female's behind, thereby, increasing the risk of becoming a casualty.(A retired cop once told me that he had no problem with women being police officers but that he didn't want to have one for a partner for the reason jst given plus he felt that due to male nature the bad guys would shoot more bllets in his direction). Technically, there are tw types of soldiers: combat and support. Both are in danger. Obviously, combat soldiers more so and sometimes certain types of support soldiers have to spend a brief period at the front - such as those delivery supplies. Please reread this paragraph and then,
I'll make my point. We're waiting...you're a slow reader (functional illiterate?). I bet that
there is disproportionally more the 12% female casualties. Feminists and politicians
who don't desire to be tarred-and-feathered or don't desire to commit political suicide
will make sure facts don't see light of day! This composer of words is going to engage
in rough speculation and estimation: there are 10% more female casualties (killed
or wounded or hurt while on duty for female support who never go need the fighting
(due to car bombs and the like but also just plain incompetence. Do you remember the support soldierthey made out to be a heroin - pardon me because she couldn't read a map and use a compass! Just like Amelia Earheart). We will assume 20% greater for those female jockey supporters who occassionally are at the front (sometimes when they shouldn't be.( What was her name. I'm losing my memory and I'm only 39?! Jessica Lynch - redemption!). And, finally, those that help? patrol streets after major combat is over (that's what we meant by semi-combat) - 30%.
We're no fans of FDR but when Nazi saboteurs were found on U.S. soil during W.W.2,
they were executed without a trial. Democrats weren't PC pantywaists prior to
the 1970s. Now, they want to put terrorists and enemy combatants in the best hotel
sweets (the spell-check died) in Manhattan!
Final Thoughts...
Re: pregnant women soldiers- soldiers don't enjoy all the rights of private citizens (are
you listening, Pat? Put your big Bible down for a second), there are military laws,
police and courts and civilian laws, police and courts. Limits can and are placed
on the rights of soldiers when in or out of uniform but on duty.
Re: Terrorists and enemy combatants - torture is: cutting off a finger, dislodging an
eyeball and chopping off a head. Terrorists or enemy combatants don't deserve all
the rights of American citizens nor do illegal aliens. This rule should apply to
foreigners who attemt to commit acts of terror aboard an American plane and Americans who commit acts of terror on a military installation in the name of Allah or Hitler!
Dedicated to Brittanicus - where ever you are!
No comments:
Post a Comment